On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: >> Heikki's suggestion seemed straightforward, so much so that I couldn't figure >> why nobody had done it. That would usually mean I'm missing something. > > If you're willing to substitute an incompatible table, it's not clear > why you don't just do > > begin; > drop table t; > alter table t_new rename to t; > commit;
Because the whole source of this problem is dependency hell. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
