On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: > >> Upon further review, I am wondering if it wouldn't be simpler and >> more logical to allow idempotent changes of these settings at any >> time, and to restrict only changes that actually change something. > > I don't care a lot about that either -- if I remember correctly, we > got here based largely on my somewhat tentative interpretation of the > standard. Even if my reading was right (of which I'm far from sure), > it would just mean that we have an extension to the standard in > allowing the benign declarations. I'm sure not going to lose any > sleep over that. > > I'll do whatever people want in this regard with no reservations.
OK, I've committed this as proposed above. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
