Jesper Krogh <jes...@krogh.cc> writes: > Would it be hard to make it support "n-grams" (e.g. making the length > configurable) instead of trigrams?
That would be a complete rewrite with an incompatible on-disk index
representation, which seems a bit beyond the scope of this patch.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
