On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 15:48, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 13:04, Alexey Klyukin <al...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:52 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: >> >>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 5:14 AM, Alexey Klyukin wrote: >>> >>>> You mean packing both a string representation and a reference to a single >>>> SV * value? >>> >>> Dunno, I'm not a guts guy. >> >> Well, neither me (I haven't used much of the guts api there). > > Find attached a proof of concept that modifies Alexey's patch to do > the above (using the overload example I and others posted). [ ... ] > Thoughts? Should I polish this a bit more? Or do we like the GUC better?
So its been over a week with no comments. ISTM there were more people against adding yet another GUC. Barring objection ill finish the missing parts of the POC patch I posted and submit that. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
