Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié ene 26 19:20:52 -0300 2011: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Ick. That's an awful lot of stuff to have global ignores for. > > > The "coverage" directory ignore seems a little icky, but the rest > > seems unlikely to pick up anything incidental. > > Tying /coverage to the root as in his V2 makes that better,
Hmm, I don't think that works, because you can run "make coverage" in any subdir and it will create a "coverage" subdir there. > but I'm > still unexcited about the thesis that we should auto-ignore the results > of any random tool somebody wants to run in their source tree. Well, in this case it's not any random tool, because it's integrated into our makefiles. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
