* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote: > You have a similar opinion like me about design this statement. But > there are others with strong negative opinion. For someone ARRAY ARRAY > should be a problem. So FOREACH is third way - more, it increase a > possibility for enhancing plpgsql in future.
I look forward to hearing from the silent majority on this then.
> the main issue was a maintainability of more complex FOR statement.
That would be a reason to not have this functionality at all, not a
reason to add confusion with a new top-level command.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
