On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 14:15 -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
> Mind you, timestamptzrange seems a mite *long* to me.
Right. I think we might need to compromise here an use some shorter
names. tsrange/tstzrange/numrange seem reasonable to me.
> Making sure it's consistent with int4, int8, bigint sure seems like a
> good idea.
OK, I'll change intrange to int4range, and add int8range. int2range
doesn't seem useful, though.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
