Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> So I'm back to proposing that we just apply FPI-free WAL records
> unconditionally, without regard to the LSN.  This could potentially
> corrupt the page, of course.

Yes.  So you're still assuming that there will be a later FPI-containing
WAL record to fix up the mess you created.  What if there isn't?

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to