Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Suppressing detail seems easiest. AFAICS all the variable parts are > in errdetail. I pushed that with some work on the tests. If you could review the changes to isolationtester.c to confirm that they look sane, I'd appreciate it. http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/kgrittn/postgres.git;a=commitdiff;h=2e0254b82a62ead25311f545b0626c97f9ac35b4#patch6 If that part is right, it shouldn't take me very long to finish the specs and capture the expected results. I really appreciate you putting this testing framework together. This is clearly the right way to do it, although we also clearly don't want this test in the check target at the root directory, because of the run time. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
