Em 08-02-2011 11:05, Simon Riggs escreveu:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 21:15 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
+ else if (recoveryTarget == RECOVERY_TARGET_NAME)
+ snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer),
+ "%s%u\t%s\t%s named restore point %
s\n",
+ (srcfd< 0) ? "" : "\n",
+ parentTLI,
+ xlogfname,
+ recoveryStopAfter ? "after" :
"before",
+ recoveryStopNamedRestorePoint);
It doesn't matter if it is after or before the restore point.
After/Before
only make sense when we're dealing with transaction or time.
Removed.
you're right
Not sure I understand the comment "only make sense when we're dealing
with transaction or time." Why?
Because named restore point is a noop xlog record; besides, transaction and
time involves xlog records that contain data.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
