On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:09 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com> >> wrote: >> > Frankly, I think you should surrender some of those 14 and cajole some >> > other folks to take on more. >> >> Happily... only trouble is, I suck at cajoling. Even my begging is >> distinctly sub-par. >> >> Pleeeeeeeease? > > Erm, I've been through the commitfest app a couple of different times, > but have ignored things which are marked 'Needs Reivew' when there's a > reviewer listed... > > If there are patches where you're marked as the reviewer but you don't > have time to review them or want help, take your name off as a reviewer > for them and/or speak up and explicitly ask for help. I'm not going to > start reviewing something if I think someone else is already working on > it..
Of the fourteen I signed up for, 10 are now marked Committed or Returned with Feedback. Of the remaining four, there are two that could use more eyes: MULTISET functions Change pg_last_xlog_receive_location not to move backwards A few other ones that could use more reviewers include: range types key locks widen scale factor limit from pgbench And your patch could probably use another reviewer too, if anyone else is looking for stuff to help with: log_csv_fields ; add current_role log option And there are a few patches with no reviewer at all. PL/Python invalidate composite argument functions PL/Python tracebacks contrib/btree_gist (submitted very late) SQL/MED - file_fdw -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers