On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:40:38AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > On 02/03/2011 01:20 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > >Well, the question seems to be whether or not it's a reasonable > >price to pay. On the whole I'm inclined to think it is, especially > >when it can be avoided by updating your code, which will be a > >saving in fragility and complexity as well. > > do you till have concerns about this, or are you happy for us to > move ahead on it?
[I'm not really paying close enough attention for you to put much weight on my opinions, but...] I can't see any major issues so I'm happy for you to move ahead. Thanks! Tim. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
