On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I needed something to test the FDW API patch with, and didn't want to get
> involved in the COPY API changes, and also wanted to have something that
> needs real connection management and can push down quals. So I updated the
> postgresql_fdw patch to work with the latest FDW patch.
>
> Here. It's a bit of a mess, but it works for simple queries..
>
> It requires a small change to the FDW api
> (fdw-api-add-serverid-userid.patch). I added server oid and user oid fields
> to the FdwPlan - that seems like basic information that most FDW's will
> need, so it seems awkward to require the FDW to wrap them in Const nodes and
> a List.
>
> These are also available in my git repository at
> git://git.postgresql.org/git/users/heikki/postgres.git, branches fdw2 and
> postgresql_fdw.

So how close are we to getting the core support committed?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to