> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 18 May 2002 00:01
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: More schema queries
>
> There was already some discussion about making a variant version of
> current_schemas() that would tell you the Whole Truth,
> including the implicitly searched schemas. Seems like we'd
> better do that; otherwise we'll find people hardwiring
> knowledge of these implicit search rules into their apps,
> which is probably a bad idea.
>
> Anyone have a preference about what to call it? I could see
> making a version of current_schemas() that takes a boolean
> parameter, or we could choose another function name for the
> implicit-schemas-too version.
Use of a parameter seems fine to me. Save having Yet Another Function
:-) and trying to figure out a sensible name for it!
> >> Curious. I have not noticed much of any change in postmaster
> >> startup time on Unix. Can you run a profile or something to
> >> see where the time is going?
>
> > Probably, but I'd need hand-holding as I don't have a clue
> how to do
> > that.
>
> I'm not sure how to do it on Cygwin, either. On Unix you'd
> build a profilable backend executable using
> cd pgsql/src/backend
> gmake clean
> gmake PROFILE="-pg" all
> install same, run it, and then use gprof on the gmon.out file
> dumped at postmaster termination. Dunno if it has to be done
> differently on Cygwin.
Well, I have gcc & gprof so I assume it'll be pretty much the same. I'll
have a play tonight.
Thanks Tom,
Dave.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
