Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes: > btree_gist is essentially required for exclusion constraints to be > useful in a practical way.
> In fact, can you submit it for the next commitfest to be included in > core? That would allow range types and exclusion constraints to be used > out-of-the-box in 9.2. > Only if you think it's reasonable to put it in core, of course. If > extensions are easy enough to install, maybe that's not really > necessary. btree_gist is entirely unready to be included in core. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-10/msg00104.php regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
