On Feb 13, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I think after a couple of releases you'd be shipping something like > > foo--1.0.sql > foo--1.1.sql > foo--1.0--1.1.sql > foo--2.0.sql > foo--1.1--2.0.sql > > and it'll soon get to be a mess if your SCM doesn't clearly distinguish > which is which. > > Also, as I mentioned before, once you've branched off foo--1.1.sql > it's probably a mistake to be changing foo--1.0.sql anymore anyway. > > I suppose if you really wanted foo.sql to always be the head version, > you could do something like "cp foo.sql foo--$VERSION.sql" as part of > the build process in the Makefile.
That would be okay. Is $EXTVERSION still defined in the Makefile? ($VERSION is the PostgreSQL version, of course). Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
