On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 22:06, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:41:11PM -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> Unpatched: >> real 17m24.171s >> real 16m52.892s >> real 16m40.624s >> real 16m41.700s >> >> Patched: >> real 15m56.249s >> real 15m47.001s >> real 15m3.018s >> real 17m16.157s >> >> Since you said that a cursory test, or no test at all, should be >> good enough given the low risk of performance regression, I didn't >> book a machine and script a large test run, but if anyone feels >> that's justified, I can arrange something. > > Based on this, I've taken the liberty of marking the patch Ready for > Committer.
Thank you very much for performance testing and reviewing! The result is interesting because I didn't intend performance optimization. At least no performance regression is enough for the purpose. -- Itagaki Takahiro -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
