On Sun, 2002-05-19 at 19:37, Tom Lane wrote: > Mark kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > However I could not get any size stabilization in the toasted case. > > Hmm. Which file(s) were growing, exactly? How many row updates is this > run covering? > > I'd rather expect the toast indexes to grow given the lack-of-btree- > collapse-logic issue.
Why sould the toast indexes grow significantly more than the primary key of main table ? > However, the rate of growth ought to be pretty > tiny --- much less than the amount of data being pumped through, for > sure. ---------- Hannu ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
