On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Marti Raudsepp's message of lun feb 14 19:39:25 -0300 2011: >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:13, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: >> > The patch had a trivial conflict in planner.c, plus plenty of offsets. >> > I've >> > attached the rebased patch that I used for review. For anyone following >> > along, >> > all the interesting hunks touch heapam.c; the rest is largely mechanical. >> > A >> > "diff -w" patch is also considerably easier to follow. >> >> Here's a simple patch for the RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap() function, >> as explained in my last post. I don't know if it's any help to you, >> but since I wrote it I might as well send it up. This applies on top >> of Noah's rebased patch. > > Got it, thanks. > >> I did some tests and it seems to work, although I also hit the same >> visibility bug as Noah. > > Yeah, that bug is fixed with the attached, though I am rethinking this > bit.
I am thinking that the statute of limitations has expired on this patch, and that we should mark it Returned with Feedback and continue working on it for 9.2. I know it's a valuable feature, but I think we're out of time. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
