* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Well, that just doesn't seem useful to me in the real world. If I were > using this, I would expect it to emit a real user name that matches the > currently applied permissions checking. All the time.
I wouldn't have ever thought to use %U w/o %u, to be honest. Unless I'm missing something though, this change would just be emitting what show_session_authorization() returns when show_role() returns 'none'. That's certainly fine by me. > "show role" does > what it does because the SQL standard says so, not because anybody > outside the standards committee thinks that's a sane definition. Guess it actually makes some sense to me. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature