hi, > YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > >> might be unrelated to the loop problem, but... > > Aha! I think it *is* related. There were several places where data > was uninitialized here; mostly because Dan was working on this piece > while I was working on separate issues which added the new fields. > I missed the interaction on integrating the two efforts. :-( > The uninitialized fields could lead to all the symptoms you saw. > I've reviewed, looking for other similar issues and didn't find any. > > Could you try the attached patch and see if this fixes the issues > you've seen?
with your previous patch or not? YAMAMOTO Takashi > > -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
