Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > Kevin Grittner ?rta: > > Michael Meskes <mich...@fam-meskes.de> wrote: > > > >> All prior ECPG versions were fine because dynamic cursor names > >> were only added in 9.0. Apparently only this one place was > >> missed. So this is a bug in the new feature, however not such a > >> major one that it warrants the complete removal IMO. I'd prefer to > >> fix this in 9.0.1. > >> > > As we are so late in the beta phase, we can live with that, hopefully > you will find time by then to review the patch which is actually not > that complex, only a bit large. The part of ECPGdo() that deals with > auto-preparing statements is moved closer to calling ecpg_execute(), > after the varargs are converted to stmt->inlist and ->outlist. > > >> Hope this cleans it up a bit. > >> > > > > Thanks. I think I get it now. > > > > To restate from another angle, to confirm my understanding: UPDATE > > WHERE CURRENT OF is working for cursors with the name hard-coded in > > the embedded statement, which is the only way cursor names were > > allowed to be specified prior to 9.0; 9.0 implements dynamic cursor > > names, allowing you to use a variable for the cursor name; but this > > one use of a cursor name isn't allowing a variable yet. Do I have > > it right? (If so, I now see why it would be considered a bug.) > > > > Yes, you understand it correctly.
Did this ever get applied? If so, I can't find it. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers