Tom Lane wrote: > Mike Fowler <m...@mlfowler.com> writes: > > On 06/08/10 17:50, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> attached updated patch with regression test > > > Bravely ignoring the quotation/varidic/<favourite_scheme_here> > > conversations, I've taken a look at the patch as is. Thanks to Tom's > > input I can now correctly drive the function. I can also report that > > code is now behaving in the expected way. > > I've gone ahead and applied this patch, since the subsequent discussion > seemed to be getting *extremely* far afield from the expressed intent > of the patch, and nobody had pointed out a reason not to fix the > number-of-parameters limitation. > > I think we have a few TODO items here: > > * Invent ... and document ... an API that permits safe assembly of a > parameter list from non-constant (and perhaps untrustworthy) values. > > * Fix xslt_process' failure to report (some?) errors detected by libxslt. > > * Move the functionality to a less deprecated place. > > None of these are within the scope of the current patch though.
Should any of these be added to our TODO list under XML? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
