Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yeah, this has been discussed before.
>> 
>> Even though this patch is far past the CF deadline, I'm a bit tempted to
>> push it into 9.1 anyway, just so we can check off that problem.

> +1.

Done.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to