Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > On 02/22/2011 05:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think this one has got far less use-case than the other, and I don't >> want to expose the internal representation of ACLITEM to the world.
> The sendv for enums sends the label, and ISTR there are some others that > send the text representation also. Would that be better? It'd be more future-proof than this patch, but I'm still unconvinced about the use-case. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers