On lör, 2011-02-26 at 09:34 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote: > ----- Original message ----- > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jan Urbański <wulc...@wulczer.org> > > wrote: > > > On 24/02/11 14:10, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Hm, perhaps, I put it in the details, because it sounded like the place > > > to put information that is not that important, but still helpful. It's > > > kind of natural to think of the traceback as the detail of the error > > > message. But if you prefer context, I'm fine with that. You want me to > > > update the patch to put the traceback in the context? > > > > I don't see a response to this question from Peter, but I read his > > email to indicate that he was hoping you'd rework along these lines. > > I can do that, but not until Monday evening.
Well, I was hoping for some other opinion, but I guess my request stands. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
