On sön, 2011-02-27 at 10:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm, so this doesn't rely on libxml2 at all?  Given the amount of pain
> that library has caused us, getting out from under it seems like a
> mighty attractive idea.

This doesn't replace the existing xml functionality, so it won't help
getting rid of libxml.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to