On sön, 2011-02-27 at 10:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Hmm, so this doesn't rely on libxml2 at all? Given the amount of pain > that library has caused us, getting out from under it seems like a > mighty attractive idea.
This doesn't replace the existing xml functionality, so it won't help getting rid of libxml. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers