On 2/28/11 10:24 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> On the other hand, anything which increases the size of pg_statistic
>> would be a nightmare.
>
> Hmm?
Like replacing each statistic with a series of time-based buckets, which
would then increase the size of the table by 5X to 10X. That was the
first solution I thought of, and rejected.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
