Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> writes: > On 2011-02-28 9:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> OK, so the intent is that in all cases, we just advance CID and don't >> take a new snapshot between queries that were generated (by rule >> expansion) from a single original parsetree? But we still take a new >> snap between original parsetrees? Works for me.
> Exactly. OK, applied with corrections (I didn't think either the spi.c or functions.c changes were quite right). regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers