On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 13:35 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > To achieve the effect Fujii is looking for, we would have to silently drop > > the connection. That would correctly leave the client not knowing whether > > the transaction committed or not. > > Yeah, this seems to make more sense.
How do you propose we do that? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
