Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > requires_superuser isn't bad, but I think I'd rather avoid "requires" > here since we're also using that terminology for prerequisite > extensions. How about "must_be_superuser"?
Sorry to continue painting in old fashioned colors, but if we're not going to reuse established terms from our “glossary”, then I'd better see us using just "superuser" here. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
