Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > I can imagine that someplace down the road we might want to allow > multiple extensions to own the same SQL object; I know that RPMs can > share ownership of files, for comparison. But today is not that day. […] > Anyone have a different answer?
What could be done is to have a common extension that installs the functions, then both plperl and plperlu would require the common bits. That's only practical when we have automatic dependency resolution at install and remove times (it should not be hard to do, but well). So for 9.1, I think you took the simplest path available. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
