Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 02/21/2011 09:33 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > Andrew Dunstan<[email protected]> writes: > > I propose that we add the following test for this case: > > AC_CHECK_HEADER(Python.h, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([header file<Python.h> > > is required for Python])]) > > You'd need to pay attention to python_includespec, but otherwise seems > > reasonable. > > Did this get done? If so, I don't see it. > >> > >> Oh, no. It skipped my TODO list. I'll try to get it done in the next day > >> or so. > > > I have added this to the 9.1 open items list: > > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Open_Items#Code_Issues > > Waste of time, because that got done some time ago.
OK, thanks. Removed. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
