Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 10.03.2011 22:50, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Has this been addressed?
>>
>> I see we have with this commit:
>>
>> 9de3aa65f01fb51cbc725e8508ea233e4e92c46c
> We fixed GiST. B-tree still has the issue that if you have a checkpoint
> in the middle of an insert, and crash, you might be left with a leaf
> node without a downlink in the parent.
But that will be fixed during WAL replay.
> That's relatively harmless, index searches and insertions work without
> the downlink. However, there's code in page deletion that ERRORs if the
> parent can't be found. That should be fixed.
I don't like the idea of removing that consistency check, and I don't
think it's necessary to do so.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
