Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 11 00:59:03 -0300 2011: > >> > >> > > At a minimum, we should probably also remove -X no-security-label and > >> > > -X no-unlogged-table-data, which don't exist in any released versions > >> > > (unless you want to count alphas). ?But considering that this has been > >> > > deprecated and undocumented since 8.2, I think it might be time to > >> > > pull the plug on -X altogether. > >> > > >> > I remove the new -X options with the attached, applied patch. ?The > >> > existing options are not really costing us anything except a few lines > >> > of code. > >> > >> Given that, it seems pretty pointless to remove support for -X options > >> that have existed for years. > > > > I agree. ?They are not documented and only are a few C lines. > > Presumably the point of deprecating the feature is that we'd > eventually remove it. If 4 major releases isn't long enough, what is?
Good point. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
