Dave Page wrote: > On 3/12/11, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > >> People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the > >> attached one-line patch to add a database comment to template0. No > >> initdb, I assume, becuase it is just a comment. > > > >> + "COMMENT ON DATABASE template0 IS 'only used by pg_dump';\n", > > > > No objection to the concept, but the actual text of this comment is > > approximately 100% wrong. > > > > I'd like to lodge a formal objection to the use of the word > 'approximately' in the above comment.
OK, funny guys. ;-) Can someone give me the right text. Obviously I don' know what template0 is used for either. Is it pg_dumpall perhaps? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
