Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> writes: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > >> OK, funny guys. ;-) Can someone give me the right text. Obviously I > >> don' know what template0 is used for either. Is it pg_dumpall perhaps? > > > template0: unmodifiable pristine empty database > > template1: default template for new databases > > Yeah, I think that the right way to approach this is to have initdb > comment *both* of those databases. I don't like that specific wording > for template0 though. Maybe > > template0: unmodified copy of original template1 database > template1: default template for new databases
Tom, the current comment for "template1" is "default template database". Do you like your above wording better? It does make it slighly longer. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
