On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 16:17, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 14:43, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Also, the text is not accurate: nothing has been automatically changed >>> to anything. The pg_hba.conf file is just as it was. You could say >>> something like "ident" authentication on local socket treated as >>> "peer", but I think a better idea would be to just remove this message >>> altogether. > >> The idea being to let people know it's been deprecated, nothing else. >> But sure, we can just remove the message - at elast for now, and maybe >> add it $n releases down the road when people are expected to have >> changed over. > > I'm with Robert on this one --- the first reaction I had to your > description of the patch was "why do we need a log message for that?" > If there were some real reason to push people away from use of the > non-preferred term, maybe it'd be worth nagging them to change; but > there isn't.
Ok. fair enough, I'll take that part out. Are people in general in favor of making the change provided I do that, then? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers