On Sat, 25 May 2002, Michael Meskes wrote: > No, this is simply not true. The version number is what the upstream > gives its release. No more no less. What RH does is becoming as subtly > incompatible a possible. If that's the goal, it doesn't look like free > software for me. Sure all changes are published, but why forcing this > kind of difference between linux distributions? Why not calling it 2.2.6 > or something if there has to be some changes that are not compatible?
Or rlibc? :) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
