On 18 March 2011 14:23, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote:
>> On 17 March 2011 17:55, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote:
>>>> errdetail("The transaction has already been committed locally but
>>>> might have not been replicated to the standby.")));
>>>> errdetail("The transaction has committed locally, but may not have
>>>> replicated to the standby.")));
>>>>
>>>> Could we have these saying precisely the same thing?
>>>
>>> Yeah. Which is better?
>>
>> Personally I prefer the 2nd. It reads better somehow.
>
> I hacked on this a bit more and ended up with a hybrid of the two.
> Hope you like it; but anyway it's consistent.
Yes, cheers :)
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
