> Was it really all that bad? IIRC we replaced ARC with the current clock
> sweep due to patent concerns. (Maybe there were performance concerns as
> well, I don't remember).
Yeah, that was why the patent was frustrating. Performance was poor and
we were planning on replacing ARC in 8.2 anyway. Instead we had to
backport it.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
