On 3/24/11 8:16 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: >> Robert Haas wrote: > >>> At least as I understand it, it's not our project policy to carry >>> around code that doesn't accomplish anything useful. I have no >>> objection to keeping the field; I simply think that if we're >>> going to have it, we should make it work > >> What a stupid conversation. > > That hardly seems like a convincing response. Adding a column to a > view when the column contains meaninful values seems less likely to > break things than initially adding it with a different value, > identical to another column, and then changing the semantics. > > +1 for either dropping it or making it work.
+1 Joe -- Joe Conway credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers