On mån, 2011-03-28 at 09:54 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote: > Well, maybe. In fact, probably. That's like asking in C if it's sane > to have a structure to contain a pointer back to itself, which of > course it is.
But this is not a pointer, it's containment. SQL has pointers, too (reference types). -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
