Hi,
I've noticed some weirdness when trying to grant various types of
permissions on a foreign table and thought I'd report it here:
postgres=# \d stuff
Foreign table "public.stuff"
Column | Type | Modifiers
--------+---------+-----------
id | integer |
colour | text |
animal | text |
Server: file
postgres=# GRANT SELECT (colour) ON FOREIGN TABLE stuff TO user_a;
ERROR: column privileges are only valid for relations
postgres=# GRANT SELECT (colour) ON TABLE stuff TO user_a;
GRANT
postgres=# GRANT SELECT ON ALL FOREIGN TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO user_a;
ERROR: syntax error at or near "FOREIGN"
LINE 1: GRANT SELECT ON ALL FOREIGN TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO user_...
^
Granting select for all tables in a schema to a user will affect
foreign tables however. And column-level permissions work with
foreign tables if you refer to them as regular tables in the
GRANT/REVOKE statement.
Using the term FOREIGN TABLE in a GRANT statement isn't documented.
I suspect this will need its own entry in the syntax definition
section of the GRANT and REVOKE reference pages.
I also noticed this doesn't work:
postgres=# CREATE TABLE animals (LIKE stuff);
ERROR: inherited relation "stuff" is not a table
Since LIKE doesn't maintain any sort of link with the table like
INHERITS does, it would be nice if this could work in future.
Thanks
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
