Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> It would probably take less than a day to flesh out this idea and >> make it happen, but it does seem like a rather large change for >> late alpha. > what we're trying to avoid is committing new stuff that may require > additional cleanup, not cleaning up the stuff we already did > commit. Once we get to beta I'll be less enthusiastic about making > changes like this +1 for fixing it, with full agreement with Robert's project management perspective on the issue. Having worked in this area a bit I definitely see the need in general, and for auto-tuning we pretty much have to do this to get it right. I think we should be edging into more auto-tuning capabilities as we figure them out, making this all the more important. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
