On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Christopher Browne <cbbro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Susanne Ebrecht <susa...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: >> Anyway, I figured out there is another argument for XML: >> >> My information is that DocBook 5.0 won't support SGML anymore. >> >> Which means - sooner or later a reaction is needed. > > Yes, indeed. > > I don't think that during the 9.1 alpha phase is the right time to > think about this, but this certainly seems appropriate to consider as > a 9.2 "ToDo" item. > > There are arguments as to why to switch to version 5, which is, > indeed, XML-only. > http://www.docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/ch01.html#introduction-why-to-switch
AFAICT, the biggest problem with our existing toolchain is that it's hard for some people to get it working. In theory, we have documentation that explains this: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/docguide-toolsets.html However, in contrast to the vast majority of our documentation, it stinks. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
