--On 28. März 2011 13:38:23 +0100 Bernd Helmle <maili...@oopsware.de> wrote:
But I think we can just call pg_table_size() regardless in 9.0+; I
believe it'll return the same results as pg_relation_size() on
non-tables. Anyone see a problem with that?
Hmm yeah, seems i was thinking too complicated...here is a cleaned up version
of this idea.
Do we consider this for 9.1 or should I add this to the CF-Next for 9.2?
--
Thanks
Bernd
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
