"Dann Corbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm tempted to suggest that we should stick _P on *all* the 
>> lexer token
>> symbols, rather than having an inconsistent set of names where some of
>> them have _P and some do not.  Or perhaps _T (for token) 
>> would be a more
>> sensible convention; I'm not sure why _P was used in the first place.

> Before you do that, realize that you are violating the implementation's
> namespace, and your code is therefore not legal ANSI/ISO C.

What?

The _P or _T is a suffix, not a prefix...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Reply via email to