Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun abr 18 09:33:06 -0300 2011:
> I don't much like Jim's syntax suggestion (the alias really ought to
> be declared within the function body, I think, not added to the CREATE
> FUNCTION statement) but I don't necessarily think it's a bad idea.
> What would be even better, in my view, is having a short alias that is
> defined by default, but all previous proposals in this vein have been
> shot down by Tom and Andrew. As a practical matter, though, I think
> what Jim is talking about speaks to a real need - people want to make
> SQL function names long and descriptive, but they do NOT want to spell
> out that long function name 16 times inside the function body.
plpgsql has the #option thing in functions; why can't we have something
similar in SQL functions?
CREATE FUNCTION function_with_really_really_descriptive_name (
some_parameter int
) RETURNS int LANGUAGE SQL AS $$
#option function_alias fwrrdn
SELECT fwrrdn.some_parameter
$$;
Not necessarily that exact syntax.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
