On 04/18/2011 04:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut<pete...@gmx.net>  writes:
This came from a review by Noah Misch a great while ago:
test=>  SELECT b FROM foo ORDER BY 1 COLLATE "C";
ERROR:  42804: collations are not supported by type integer
According to SQL92, this should be supported.  Do we want to bother?  It
doesn't look hard to fix, so it's really only a question of whether this
would be useful, or its absence would be too confusing.
The ORDER BY 1 business seems to me to be legacy anyway.  I'm not
inclined to put in even more hacks to make strange combinations work
there --- I think we're likely to find ourselves painted into a corner
someday as it is.

                        

It's likely to be used by SQL generators if nothing else, and I've been known to use it as a very convenient shorthand. It would seem to me like quite a strange inconsistency to allow order by n with some qualifiers but not others.

cheers

andrew

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to